A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trial of fixed-dose brexpiprazole for the treatment of adults with acute schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.038Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole versus placebo in adults with acute schizophrenia. This was a 6-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind phase 3 study. Patients with acute schizophrenia were randomized to brexpiprazole 1, 2 or 4 mg, or placebo (2:3:3:3) once daily. The primary endpoint was changed from baseline at week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; the key secondary endpoint was Clinical Global Impressions—Severity (CGI-S) at week 6.

Brexpiprazole 4 mg showed statistically significant improvement versus placebo (treatment difference: − 6.47, p = 0.0022) for the primary endpoint. Improvement compared with placebo was also seen for the key secondary endpoint (treatment difference: − 0.38, p = 0.0015), and on multiple secondary efficacy outcomes. Brexpiprazole 1 and 2 mg also showed numerical improvements versus placebo, although p > 0.05. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, insomnia and agitation; incidences of akathisia were lower in the brexpiprazole treatment groups (4.2%–6.5%) versus placebo (7.1%). Brexpiprazole treatment was associated with moderate weight gain at week 6 (1.23–1.89 kg versus 0.35 kg for placebo); there were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters and vital signs. In conclusion, brexpiprazole 4 mg is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for acute schizophrenia in adults.

Clinical Trials.gov NCT01393613; BEACON trial.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, progressive and debilitating mental illness (Messias et al., 2007, McGrath et al., 2008) that substantially contributes to disability (Whiteford et al., 2013). In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, schizophrenia ranked sixteenth world-wide (ninth in North America), regarding Years Lived with Disability (Vos et al., 2012) and, of 289 studied diseases and injuries, was the illness with the highest disability weighting (Salomon et al., 2012).

Individuals with schizophrenia experience striking and well-known positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions, thought disorders) but also typically experience negative symptoms (e.g. social withdrawal and lack of emotion, energy and motivation), cognitive symptoms and behavioral changes. Symptoms experienced by patients with schizophrenia can negatively impact their ability to maintain personal relationships, engage productively in work and care for themselves (Lieberman et al., 2001, Bobes et al., 2007, Stip and Tourjman, 2010). Current second-generation antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia are efficacious for positive symptoms with low propensity to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (Kane and Correll, 2010). While these drugs have represented an important advance in treating schizophrenia, it is still important to develop and offer new drugs with pharmacologies that differ from those of currently available drugs, as physicians and patients seek additions to the current armamentarium. The pharmacological profiles of current second-generation antipsychotics vary with respect to affinity for dopamine and/or serotonin receptor subtypes, and adrenergic, histamine and/or muscarinic receptors (Correll, 2010). The different receptor-binding profiles of current antipsychotics may contribute to variance in associated side effects (Correll, 2010), including hyperprolactinemia (and associated sexual effects), sedation, weight gain and other metabolic effects (De Hert et al., 2012, Leucht et al., 2013). The movement disorder akathisia is another common side effect associated with dopamine receptor antagonists, and may be associated with subjective distress in patients (Kane et al., 2009).

Side effects associated with current schizophrenia treatments can affect the ability of the patient to function and interact with others, potentially affecting their subjective well-being and quality of life (Correll, 2010). Treatment choice among currently available antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia requires trade-offs between different activating and sedating adverse effects; additional, safe treatment options to compensate for the highly heterogeneous responses between individuals are needed (Correll, 2010). There is a need for better tolerated antipsychotics with broad-based symptom control (positive and negative, as well as cognitive and behavioral) that improve patient functioning by having minimal sedating or activating effects, negligible impacts upon prolactin/sexual functioning and inconsequential neuromotor or cardiovascular adverse effects.

Brexpiprazole, a rationally designed serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, acts as a partial agonist with similar potency at serotonin 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and a potent antagonist at serotonin 5-HT2A and noradrenaline α1B and α2C receptors (Maeda et al., 2014b). Brexpiprazole's D2 receptor partial agonism with lower intrinsic activity than the only currently available D2 partial agonist, aripiprazole (Maeda et al., 2014b), suggests a low potential to induce D2 agonist-mediated adverse effects such as akathisia, insomnia, restlessness and nausea (Fleischhacker, 2005). Brexpiprazole's potential to induce D2 antagonist-like adverse effects, such as EPS, hyperprolactinemia and tardive dyskinesia, is also considered to be lower than that of D2 antagonists (Maeda et al., 2014a). In addition, the balanced binding ratio of brexpiprazole to 5-HT2A, and 5-HT1A, relative to D2, may translate into low incidences of both activation-like and antipsychotic-like adverse effects. Finally, brexpiprazole has moderate affinity, relative to D2/5-HT1A receptor affinity, for histamine H1 (Maeda et al., 2014b), which may result in low levels of sedation.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of three fixed doses of brexpiprazole (1, 2 and 4 mg) compared with placebo in the treatment of acute schizophrenia in adults. The 1 mg group was included to explore the lower efficacious dose of brexpiprazole.

Section snippets

Patients

Male and female patients were recruited from 64 study centers from Colombia, Croatia, Mexico, Philippines, Russia, Slovakia, Taiwan and the USA. Eligible subjects were 18–65 years of age with a current diagnosis of schizophrenia (defined by DSM-IV-TR and confirmed by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders Studies) who were experiencing an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and marked deterioration of usual function, as demonstrated by

Results

Of 1005 patients screened, 674 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment (Colombia 8%, Croatia 6%, Mexico 5%, Philippines 2%, Russia 39%, Slovakia 1%, Taiwan 3%, USA 36%). Of these, 674 and 657 patients were included in the safety and efficacy samples, respectively.

In total, 458/674 patients (68.0%) completed the study: 81/120 (67.5%), 129/186 (69.4%) and 130/184 (70.7%) in the brexpiprazole 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg groups, respectively, compared with 118/184 (64.1%) in the placebo group (

Discussion

This 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study was conducted in adult patients with an episode of acute schizophrenia, who were markedly ill as evidenced by high baseline PANSS and CGI-S scores.

This study demonstrated that treatment with brexpiprazole 4 mg resulted in superior improvement in PANSS Total Score (primary efficacy endpoint) and CGI-S Score (key secondary endpoint) compared with placebo after 6 weeks (p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0015, respectively). The improvement from

Funding body agreements and policies

Elsevier has established agreements and developed policies to allow authors whose articles appear in journals published by Elsevier, to comply with potential manuscript archiving requirements as specified as conditions of their grant awards. To learn more about existing agreements and policies please visit http://www.elsevier.com/fundingbodies.

Contributors

Drs Kane, Skuban, Youakim, Hobart, Pfister, McQuade, Nyilas, Carson and Sanchez designed the study and wrote the protocol. Drs Kane, Skuban, McQuade and Eriksson contributed to interpretation of the data, and Dr Ouyang performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Ruth Steer, PhD, (QXV Communications, Macclesfield, UK) provided writing support, which was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (Princeton, USA)

Conflict of interest

Dr Kane has been a consultant for Amgen, Alkermes, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EnVivo Pharmaceuticals (Forum) Genentech, H. Lundbeck. Intracellular Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre, Proteus, Reviva, Roche and Sunovion.

Dr Kane has been on the Speakers Bureaus for Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Genentech and Otsuka, and is a shareholder in MedAvante, Inc.

Drs Skuban, Ouyang, Hobart, Pfister, McQuade, Nyilas, Carson

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the investigators at the study sites as well as the subjects who participated in this study.

References (34)

  • H.A. Whiteford et al.

    Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • T.R. Barnes

    A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • J. Bobes et al.

    Quality of life in schizophrenic patients

    Dialogues Clin. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • P. Chappell et al.

    Initial validity and reliability data on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • M. De Hert et al.

    Metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects associated with antipsychotic drugs

    Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.

    (2012)
  • W.W. Fleischhacker

    Aripiprazole

    Expert. Opin. Pharmacother.

    (2005)
  • G. Gharabawi et al.

    The impact of insight on functioning in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving risperidone long-acting injectable

    J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (132)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: Funding for this study was provided by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (Princeton, USA) and H. Lundbeck A/S (Valby, Denmark) (Clinical Trials.gov NCT01393613).

    View full text