Forming first impressions of others in schizophrenia: Impairments in fast processing and in use of spatial frequency information
Introduction
People with schizophrenia have deficits across a number of social cognitive domains including facial emotion recognition, theory of mind, and social perception (Green et al., 2008, Kohler et al., 2010, Savla et al., 2013). These impairments affect ability to engage in social interactions and are related to poor functional outcome (Couture et al., 2006, Fett et al., 2011, Irani et al., 2012). One important area of social functioning is the ability to make spontaneous judgments about an individual's personality characteristics or perceived intent based on facial information. However, there is a paucity of studies examining mechanisms by which individuals with schizophrenia form first impressions.
Frequently, individuals form first impressions of others' traits and characteristics to determine how threatening, trustworthy, intelligent, likeable, attractive, or competent they are. First impressions can be made based on emotional expressions in faces, facial structure, and even subtle expressions in neutral faces (Hassin and Trope, 2000, Oosterhof and Todorov, 2008, Said et al., 2009). This process is spontaneous, based on limited information, and, regardless of accuracy, can affect social interactions and behavior (Willis and Todorov, 2006, Olivola and Todorov, 2010).
Additionally, some judgments, particularly those of threat and trustworthiness, may be crucial for survival. Thus, one would expect these judgments to be made very quickly, which turns out to be the case. In two similar studies, ratings of threat (Bar et al., 2006) and trustworthiness (Todorov et al., 2009) made by healthy individuals after exposure to neutral faces in as short a duration as 33–39 ms agreed with ratings made at more leisure. Whether patients with schizophrenia need longer durations of viewing faces than controls to make a first impression remains an open question. Studies showing that patients need longer exposure durations to achieve configural processing of faces similar to that of controls (Butler et al., 2008) and have increased reaction time when making social appraisals (Taylor et al., 2011) suggest that this may be the case.
Little is known about mechanisms used to form first impressions, even in healthy individuals. Bar et al. (2006) assessed the role of spatial frequency content in first impression formation because low spatial frequency (LSF, low resolution) information is extracted much more rapidly than high spatial frequency (HSF, fine detail) information, providing coarse-to-fine processing of information (Bar, 2003). Furthermore, LSF information involves neural circuitry implicated in threat perception (Adolphs et al., 1999, Vuilleumier et al., 2003). As hypothesized, LSF processing played a role in first impression formation: a significant relationship was found between threat judgments made from LSF-filtered faces, but not HSF-filtered faces, shown for 39 ms and judgments made from unfiltered faces. Some studies show that patients with schizophrenia exhibit impairment in processing LSF information in objects, faces, and simple stimuli (O'Donnell et al., 2002, Butler et al., 2005, Martinez et al., 2008, Silverstein et al., 2010, Martinez et al., 2011, Calderone et al., 2013). Other studies found impairment in processing both LSF and HSF information (Slaghuis, 1998, Keri et al., 2002). Thus, patients may not utilize spatial frequency, particularly LSF information, similarly to controls in forming first impressions.
Given the impact of first impressions and difficulties in social cognition of patients with schizophrenia, it is important to understand the mechanisms of first impression formation. The present study utilized the paradigm of Bar et al. (2006) to investigate the possibility that patients need longer duration and utilize different mechanisms than healthy controls to form first impressions. Specifically, it was hypothesized that controls would be able to quickly form a consistent first impression that would be reliant on the use of LSF information. It was hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia would take longer to make a stable first impression and require HSF as well as LSF information to do so.
Section snippets
Participants
Data were collected in two separate experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were 47 patients (39 male) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (Fourth Edition; DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia (n = 38) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 9), and 43 controls (24 male) of similar age. In Experiment 2, participants were 40 patients (34 male) meeting criteria for schizophrenia (n = 32) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 8) and 38 controls (21 male) of similar age. Thirty-seven patients
Group, duration, filter, and gender comparisons
An ANOVA of group by filter type by duration with gender as a covariate did not show any significant interactions (η2p < 0.07 for all interactions) or main effects of diagnostic group (likelihood ratio test (LRT) χ2(1) = 0.15, p = 0.696; η2p = 0.0002), or gender (LRT χ2(1) = 2.64, p = 0.104; η2p = 0.003). The threat ratings were lower for 39 ms duration than for 390 ms (difference = 0.20, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.25) and 1703 ms (difference = 0.26, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.32) durations (which did not differ between each
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to explore the formation of first impressions in individuals with schizophrenia. Both the duration and effects of spatial frequency content of stimuli were assessed using the paradigm of Bar et al. (2006) to evaluate threat perception.
For controls, as hypothesized, consistent first impressions of threat in faces were formed rapidly, requiring only 39 ms to obtain significant agreement with faces shown for a longer duration (1703 ms). These results replicate Bar et
Role of funding source
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 MH084848 to PDB).
Contributors
Authors PDB, MB, NGW, and IA designed the study. Authors JV, FT, and PDB managed the literature searches. Authors EP, ZS, JV, VZ, NGW, and PDB contributed to data analysis. Author JV wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
No authors report financial relationships with commercial interests.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to all participants who donated their time and energy to this project. We also thank Dr. Karen Nolan for helpful discussions regarding this study.
References (55)
- et al.
Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage
Neuropsychologia
(1999) - et al.
Evidence of altered cortical and amygdala activation during social decision-making in schizophrenia
NeuroImage
(2008) - et al.
The magnocellular visual pathway and facial emotion misattribution errors in schizophrenia
Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry
(2013) - et al.
What's in a face? Effects of stimulus duration and inversion on face processing in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2008) - et al.
Assessment of social judgments and complex mental states in the early phases of psychosis
Schizophr. Res.
(2008) - et al.
The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2011) - et al.
Persecutory delusions and the perception of trustworthiness in unfamiliar faces in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res.
(2010) - et al.
A meta-analysis of emotion perception and functional outcomes in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2012) - et al.
Paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic processing of facially displayed affect
J. Psychiatr. Res.
(1992) - et al.
Patients with schizophrenia are biased toward low spatial frequency to decode facial expression at a glance
Neuropsychologia
(2010)