Forming first impressions of others in schizophrenia: Impairments in fast processing and in use of spatial frequency information

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Individuals form first impressions of others all the time, which affects their social functioning. Typical adults form threat impressions in faces with neutral expressions quickly, requiring less than 40 ms. These impressions appear to be mediated by low spatial frequency (LSF) content in the images. Little is known, however, about mechanisms of first impression formation in schizophrenia. The current study investigated how quickly individuals with schizophrenia can form consistent impressions of threat compared with controls and explored the mechanisms involved. Patients and controls were presented intact, LSF- or high spatial frequency (HSF)-filtered faces with durations that varied from 39 to 1703 ms and were asked to rate how threatening each face was on a scale from 1 to 5. In order to assess the speed of impression formation for intact faces, correlations were calculated for ratings made at each duration compared to a reference duration of 1703 ms for each group. Controls demonstrated a significant relation for intact faces presented for 39 ms, whereas patients required 390 ms to demonstrate a significant relation with the reference duration. For controls, LSFs primarily contributed to the formation of consistent threat impressions at 39 ms, whereas patients showed a trend for utilizing both LSF and HSF information to form consistent threat impressions at 390 ms. Results indicate that individuals with schizophrenia require a greater integration time to form a stable “first impression” of threat, which may be related to the need to utilize compensatory mechanisms such as HSF, as well as LSF, information.

Introduction

People with schizophrenia have deficits across a number of social cognitive domains including facial emotion recognition, theory of mind, and social perception (Green et al., 2008, Kohler et al., 2010, Savla et al., 2013). These impairments affect ability to engage in social interactions and are related to poor functional outcome (Couture et al., 2006, Fett et al., 2011, Irani et al., 2012). One important area of social functioning is the ability to make spontaneous judgments about an individual's personality characteristics or perceived intent based on facial information. However, there is a paucity of studies examining mechanisms by which individuals with schizophrenia form first impressions.

Frequently, individuals form first impressions of others' traits and characteristics to determine how threatening, trustworthy, intelligent, likeable, attractive, or competent they are. First impressions can be made based on emotional expressions in faces, facial structure, and even subtle expressions in neutral faces (Hassin and Trope, 2000, Oosterhof and Todorov, 2008, Said et al., 2009). This process is spontaneous, based on limited information, and, regardless of accuracy, can affect social interactions and behavior (Willis and Todorov, 2006, Olivola and Todorov, 2010).

Additionally, some judgments, particularly those of threat and trustworthiness, may be crucial for survival. Thus, one would expect these judgments to be made very quickly, which turns out to be the case. In two similar studies, ratings of threat (Bar et al., 2006) and trustworthiness (Todorov et al., 2009) made by healthy individuals after exposure to neutral faces in as short a duration as 33–39 ms agreed with ratings made at more leisure. Whether patients with schizophrenia need longer durations of viewing faces than controls to make a first impression remains an open question. Studies showing that patients need longer exposure durations to achieve configural processing of faces similar to that of controls (Butler et al., 2008) and have increased reaction time when making social appraisals (Taylor et al., 2011) suggest that this may be the case.

Little is known about mechanisms used to form first impressions, even in healthy individuals. Bar et al. (2006) assessed the role of spatial frequency content in first impression formation because low spatial frequency (LSF, low resolution) information is extracted much more rapidly than high spatial frequency (HSF, fine detail) information, providing coarse-to-fine processing of information (Bar, 2003). Furthermore, LSF information involves neural circuitry implicated in threat perception (Adolphs et al., 1999, Vuilleumier et al., 2003). As hypothesized, LSF processing played a role in first impression formation: a significant relationship was found between threat judgments made from LSF-filtered faces, but not HSF-filtered faces, shown for 39 ms and judgments made from unfiltered faces. Some studies show that patients with schizophrenia exhibit impairment in processing LSF information in objects, faces, and simple stimuli (O'Donnell et al., 2002, Butler et al., 2005, Martinez et al., 2008, Silverstein et al., 2010, Martinez et al., 2011, Calderone et al., 2013). Other studies found impairment in processing both LSF and HSF information (Slaghuis, 1998, Keri et al., 2002). Thus, patients may not utilize spatial frequency, particularly LSF information, similarly to controls in forming first impressions.

Given the impact of first impressions and difficulties in social cognition of patients with schizophrenia, it is important to understand the mechanisms of first impression formation. The present study utilized the paradigm of Bar et al. (2006) to investigate the possibility that patients need longer duration and utilize different mechanisms than healthy controls to form first impressions. Specifically, it was hypothesized that controls would be able to quickly form a consistent first impression that would be reliant on the use of LSF information. It was hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia would take longer to make a stable first impression and require HSF as well as LSF information to do so.

Section snippets

Participants

Data were collected in two separate experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were 47 patients (39 male) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (Fourth Edition; DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia (n = 38) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 9), and 43 controls (24 male) of similar age. In Experiment 2, participants were 40 patients (34 male) meeting criteria for schizophrenia (n = 32) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 8) and 38 controls (21 male) of similar age. Thirty-seven patients

Group, duration, filter, and gender comparisons

An ANOVA of group by filter type by duration with gender as a covariate did not show any significant interactions (η2p < 0.07 for all interactions) or main effects of diagnostic group (likelihood ratio test (LRT) χ2(1) = 0.15, p = 0.696; η2p = 0.0002), or gender (LRT χ2(1) = 2.64, p = 0.104; η2p = 0.003). The threat ratings were lower for 39 ms duration than for 390 ms (difference = 0.20, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.25) and 1703 ms (difference = 0.26, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.32) durations (which did not differ between each

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to explore the formation of first impressions in individuals with schizophrenia. Both the duration and effects of spatial frequency content of stimuli were assessed using the paradigm of Bar et al. (2006) to evaluate threat perception.

For controls, as hypothesized, consistent first impressions of threat in faces were formed rapidly, requiring only 39 ms to obtain significant agreement with faces shown for a longer duration (1703 ms). These results replicate Bar et

Role of funding source

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 MH084848 to PDB).

Contributors

Authors PDB, MB, NGW, and IA designed the study. Authors JV, FT, and PDB managed the literature searches. Authors EP, ZS, JV, VZ, NGW, and PDB contributed to data analysis. Author JV wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

No authors report financial relationships with commercial interests.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to all participants who donated their time and energy to this project. We also thank Dr. Karen Nolan for helpful discussions regarding this study.

References (55)

  • R. McBain et al.

    Differential roles of low and high spatial frequency content in abnormal facial emotion perception in schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2010)
  • L.G. McIntosh et al.

    Social trait judgement and affect recognition from static faces and video vignettes in schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2014)
  • A.E. Pinkham et al.

    Neural bases for impaired social cognition in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2008)
  • A.E. Pinkham et al.

    Actively paranoid patients with schizophrenia over attribute anger to neutral faces

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2011)
  • P. Premkumar et al.

    Misattribution bias of threat-related facial expressions is related to a longer duration of illness and poor executive function in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

    Eur. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • G.P. Strauss et al.

    Cognition–emotion interactions are modulated by working memory capacity in individuals with schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2012)
  • S.F. Taylor et al.

    Social appraisal in chronic psychosis: role of medial frontal and occipital networks

    J. Psychiatr. Res.

    (2011)
  • B.I. Turetsky et al.

    Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: when and why does it go awry?

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2007)
  • N.C. Andreasen

    The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Iowa City

    (1984)
  • D. Baas et al.

    Social judgement in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia and healthy relatives: behavioural evidence of social brain dysfunction

    Psychol. Med.

    (2008)
  • M. Bar

    A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • M. Bar et al.

    Very first impressions

    Emotion

    (2006)
  • P.D. Butler et al.

    Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • P.D. Butler et al.

    Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments

    Brain

    (2007)
  • D.J. Calderone et al.

    Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2013)
  • S.M. Couture et al.

    The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (2006)
  • A. Giersch et al.

    On disturbed time continuity in schizophrenia: an elementary impairment in visual perception?

    Front. Psychol.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text