Schizophrenia Research
Volume 127, Issue 1 , Pages 115-122, April 2011

Probabilistic learning and inference in schizophrenia

  • Bruno B. Averbeck

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, United States
    • Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Bldg. 49, Room 1B-80, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, United States. Tel.: +1 301 594 1126.
  • ,
  • Simon Evans

      Affiliations

    • Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
  • ,
  • Viraj Chouhan

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Cognition Schizophrenia and Imaging Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, UK
  • ,
  • Eleanor Bristow

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Cognition Schizophrenia and Imaging Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, UK
  • ,
  • Sukhwinder S. Shergill

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Cognition Schizophrenia and Imaging Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, UK

Received 21 July 2010; received in revised form 30 July 2010; accepted 5 August 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Abstract 

Patients with schizophrenia make decisions on the basis of less evidence when required to collect information to make an inference, a behavior often called jumping to conclusions. The underlying basis for this behavior remains controversial. We examined the cognitive processes underpinning this finding by testing subjects on the beads task, which has been used previously to elicit jumping to conclusions behavior, and a stochastic sequence learning task, with a similar decision theoretic structure. During the sequence learning task, subjects had to learn a sequence of button presses, while receiving a noisy feedback on their choices. We fit a Bayesian decision making model to the sequence task and compared model parameters to the choice behavior in the beads task in both patients and healthy subjects. We found that patients did show a jumping to conclusions style; and those who picked early in the beads task tended to learn less from positive feedback in the sequence task. This favours the likelihood of patients selecting early because they have a low threshold for making decisions, and that they make choices on the basis of relatively little evidence.

Keywords: Learning, Inference, Decision making

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(10)01455-6

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.009

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 127, Issue 1 , Pages 115-122, April 2011