Schizophrenia Research
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 219-225, September 2010

Psychopathology, social adjustment and personality correlates of schizotypy clusters in a large nonclinical sample

  • Neus Barrantes-Vidal

      Affiliations

    • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
    • Sant Pere Claver-Fundació Sanitària, Spain
    • CIBER Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
  • ,
  • Kathryn E. Lewandowski

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Medical School, United States
  • ,
  • Thomas R. Kwapil

      Affiliations

    • University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170, United States. Tel.: +1 336 256 0003; fax: +1 336 334 5066.

Received 28 November 2009; received in revised form 7 January 2010; accepted 11 January 2010. published online 08 February 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

Correlational methods, unlike cluster analyses, cannot take into account the possibility that individuals score highly on more than one symptom dimension simultaneously. This may account for some of the inconsistency found in the literature of correlates of schizotypy dimensions. This study explored the clustering of positive and negative schizotypy dimensions in nonclinical subjects and whether schizotypy clusters have meaningful patterns of adjustment in terms of psychopathology, social functioning, and personality.

Methods

Positive and negative schizotypy dimensional scores were derived from the Chapman Psychosis-Proneness Scales for 6137 college students and submitted to cluster analysis. Of these, 780 completed the NEO-PI-R and Social Adjustment Scale-self report version, and a further 430 were interviewed for schizophrenia-spectrum, mood, and substance use psychopathology.

Results

Four clusters were obtained: low (nonschizotypic), high positive, high negative, and mixed (high positive and negative) schizotypy. The positive schizotypy cluster presented high rates of psychotic-like experiences, schizotypal and paranoid symptoms, had affective and substance abuse pathology, and was open to experience and extraverted. The negative schizotypy cluster had high rates of negative and schizoid symptoms, impaired social adjustment, high conscientiousness and low agreeableness. The mixed cluster was the most deviant on almost all aspects.

Conclusions

Our cluster solution is consistent with the limited cluster analytic studies reported in schizotypy and schizophrenia, indicating that meaningful profiles of schizotypy features can be detected in nonclinical populations. The clusters identified displayed a distinct and meaningful pattern of correlates in different domains, thus providing construct validity to the schizotypy types defined.

Keywords: Schizotypy, Schizophrenia, Cluster analysis, Psychopathology, Personality, Social adjustment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(10)00044-7

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.006

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 219-225, September 2010