Schizophrenia Research
Volume 118, Issue 1 , Pages 26-33, May 2010

Memory profiles in schizophrenia: Categorization validity and stability

  • Morris D. Bell

      Affiliations

    • VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service, United States
    • Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Psychology Service 116B, VA Connecticut, Healthcare System, West Haven CT 06516, United States. Tel.: +1 203 932 5711x2281; fax: +1 203 937 4883.
  • ,
  • Jason K. Johannesen

      Affiliations

    • VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service, United States
    • Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States
  • ,
  • Tamasine C. Greig

      Affiliations

    • Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States
  • ,
  • Bruce E. Wexler

      Affiliations

    • Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States

Received 20 November 2009; received in revised form 24 December 2009; accepted 29 December 2009. published online 20 January 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Memory profiles corresponding to nearly normal (NN), Subcortical impairment (Sub) and Cortical impairment (Cort) have been identified in schizophrenia by several investigators using cluster analytic techniques. Specific aims of the current study were to (1) perform a K means cluster analysis using Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-R scores (2) create classification rules based upon cluster distributions and expected memory profiles and to determine their concordance with cluster analysis; (3) explore differences among classified groups on demographic, neurocognitive and social cognitive domains; and (4) determine the stability of the classifications 12months later.

Methods

Clinical and neuropsychological assessments were obtained at intake and 12months from 151 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from an urban community mental health center.

Results

Clusters corresponded to those of the three expected subgroups. Using simple decision rules, rationally-derived groups were created and had 90% classification agreement with cluster groups. Groups did not differ on illness characteristics. Groups differed significantly in neurocognitive and social cognitive domains with NN>Cort and NN>Sub in all domains except visual/motor speed. Sub>Cort in verbal working memory. NN>Cort in social cognition. Rationally derived groupings showed fair stability at 12month follow-up with 65% classification agreement. Specificity was good for NN (82.4%).

Discussion

Results support validity of memory profiles and offer some support for their stability at 12months. The simple rules for classification can be used by other investigators for neuroimaging and other studies. Findings support the hypothesis that verbal memory may be an important source of heterogeneity in schizophrenia.

Keywords: Schizophrenia, Neuropsychology, Verbal memory, Neurocognition, Social cognition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(10)00004-6

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.037

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 118, Issue 1 , Pages 26-33, May 2010