Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 101-109 (January 2007)


View previous. 11 of 49 View next.

The distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in the population: A latent class analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey

Mark ShevlinaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jamie Murphya, Martin J. Dorahybc, Gary Adamsona

Received 7 June 2006; received in revised form 7 August 2006; accepted 15 September 2006. published online 13 November 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

Previous research has suggested that psychosis is better described as a continuum rather than a dichotomous entity. This study aimed to describe the distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in the general population by means of latent class analysis.

Method

Latent class analysis was used to identify homogeneous sub-types of psychosis-like experiences. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to interpret the nature of the latent classes, or groups, by estimating the associations with demographic factors, clinical variables, and experiences of traumatic events.

Results

The best fitting latent class model was a four-class solution: a psychosis class, a hallucinatory class, an intermediate class, and a normative class. The associations between the latent classes and the demographic risk factors, clinical variables, and experiences of traumatic events showed significantly higher risks for the psychosis class, the hallucinatory class, and the intermediate class compared to the normative class. Furthermore there appeared to be a grading in the magnitude of the odds ratios: the odds ratios for the psychosis group were generally higher than those for the hallucinatory class, and the odds ratios for the hallucinatory class were generally higher than those for the intermediate class.

Conclusions

The latent class analysis showed that psychosis-like symptoms at the population level could be best explained by four groups that appeared to represent an underlying continuum.

KeywordPsychosis

a Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Ulster at Magee College, UK

b The Trauma Resource Centre, North and West Belfast HSS Trust, UK

c School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster at Magee Campus, L'Derry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, UK. Tel.: +44 28 71 375619.

PII: S0920-9964(06)00401-4

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.09.014


View previous. 11 of 49 View next.