Schizophrenia Research
Volume 86, Issue 1 , Pages 80-88, September 2006

The conviction of delusional beliefs scale: Reliability and validity

  • Dennis R. Combs

      Affiliations

    • University of Tulsa, Department of Psychology, Lorton Hall, Room 308, 600 South College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 918 631 2751; fax: +1 918 631 2833.
  • ,
  • Scott D. Adams

      Affiliations

    • University of Tulsa, Department of Psychology, Lorton Hall, Room 308, 600 South College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104, United States
  • ,
  • Christopher O. Michael

      Affiliations

    • University of Tulsa, Department of Psychology, Lorton Hall, Room 308, 600 South College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104, United States
  • ,
  • David L. Penn

      Affiliations

    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
  • ,
  • Michael R. Basso

      Affiliations

    • University of Tulsa, Department of Psychology, Lorton Hall, Room 308, 600 South College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104, United States
  • ,
  • Wm. Drew Gouvier

      Affiliations

    • Louisiana State University, Department of Psychology, Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States

Received 7 February 2006; received in revised form 9 June 2006; accepted 14 June 2006.

Abstract 

This study reports on the development of a new measure of delusional belief conviction, the Conviction of Delusional Beliefs Scale (CDBS). Most of the current scales in use assess belief conviction with a single item and primarily reflect the cognitive aspects of conviction. The CDBS represents an improvement over existing scales in that it contains a larger number of test items that can be subjected to psychometric examination. In addition, the CDBS also broadens the concept of belief conviction by incorporating cognitive, emotional, and behavioral items. In the present study, fifty participants with delusions completed the CDBS along with measures of delusional ideation, psychiatric symptomatology, insight, and reading ability. The CDBS showed very good levels of internal consistency and test–retest stability over a six-week period. All of the CDBS items loaded highly on a unitary factor of belief conviction. The CDBS positively correlated with four measures of belief conviction thereby reflecting the convergent validity of the scale. The CDBS was unrelated to other dimensions of delusional ideation, psychiatric symptomatology, insight, and reading ability, which supported the discriminant validity of the scale. The CDBS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of delusional belief conviction that could be used in clinical and research settings.

Keywords: Delusions, Conviction, Assessment, Beliefs

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(06)00292-1

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.023

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 86, Issue 1 , Pages 80-88, September 2006