Schizophrenia Research
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 43-54, 1 July 2005

Antisaccade and smooth pursuit performance in positive- and negative-symptom schizotypy

  • Anne-Lise V. Holahan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1B1
    • Douglas Hospital Research Center, Verdun, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Gillian A. O'Driscoll

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1B1
    • Douglas Hospital Research Center, Verdun, QC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 514 398 4916; fax: +1 514 398 4896.

Received 9 April 2004; received in revised form 7 October 2004; accepted 11 October 2004.

Abstract 

Schizophrenic patients have well-documented abnormalities in smooth pursuit eye movements and antisaccade performance. In populations at risk for schizophrenia, smooth pursuit abnormalities are also well documented. Antisaccade deficits have been replicated in high-risk populations as well, but the findings are more variable and the reasons for the variability are not clear. Some evidence suggests that antisaccade deficits increase in high-risk populations in relation to the presence of positive symptoms. Whether antisaccade deficits increase in relation to negative symptoms in high-risk populations is relatively uninvestigated. We evaluated antisaccade and pursuit performance in “psychometric schizotypes” who had elevated scores on either the Perceptual Aberration Scale (PerAb; i.e., positive symptoms) or the Physical Anhedonia Scale (PhysAnh; i.e., negative symptoms) but not both, and in normal controls. We used the standard version of the antisaccade task, for which results in positive-symptom schizotypes have previously been reported, and investigated performance on a gap and overlap version. We replicated the finding that a significantly larger percentage of positive-symptom schizotypes than controls have elevated antisaccade error rates on the standard antisaccade task (P=0.03); the percentage of negative-symptom schizotypes with elevated antisaccade error rates did not differ from that of control subjects. Neither schizotypal group was impaired on the gap or overlap versions of the task. On the pursuit task, a higher percentage of positive- and negative-symptom schizotypes were classified as having deviant performance than control subjects (both Ps<0.04). These findings suggest that antisaccade deficits may be better at identifying high-risk subjects with positive symptoms. Pursuit deficits identified both positive- and negative-symptom schizotypes, but was better at identifying the latter.

Keywords: Smooth pursuit, Antisaccade, Schizotypy, Schizophrenia, Risk, Symptoms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(04)00384-6

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.10.005

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 43-54, 1 July 2005